This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Big-endian targets: don't ignore offset into DW_OP_implicit_value


On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Andreas Arnez <arnez@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>> I've tried, but I don't know to make it work.  Switching to the opposite
>> endianness affects more than just the byte order of variable contents;
>> the variables are not even found any more.  Any idea?
>>
>>> Otherwise, patch is good to me.
>
> Is it OK then to push the patch?  The logic for testing both little- and
> big-endian byte order can still be added later, right?
>

Hi Andreas,
Yes, the patch can be pushed in.  I can take a look at the test for both
endianess later.

-- 
Yao (齐尧)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]