Re: [PATCH 1/8] Fixup testcases outputting own name as a test name

[Luis Machado <lgustavo at codesourcery dot com>]

On 11/25/2016 12:02 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
> On 2016-11-25 12:55, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > Or just not pass anything about the target file?
> > "failed to compile" works just as well, IMO.  If you need more detail,
> > it's in the gdb.log.
>
> Agreed, I think that's even better.  I was first thinking it would be
> useful to have the dest file, in the cases where the same source file is
> compiled multiple times to multiple destinations.  But you're right that
> if you want details, you'll go look at gdb.log.  It's enough for the
> test name to give a rough idea of what failed.

Great. I'll adjust things.

Should i get the existing tests that already output srcfile paths on 
compilation failures fixed up and standardized with this patch as well 
or with a separate one?

I'd hate to fix some of these up and leave other offenders lying around.