Re: [PATCH] Document short responses to qXfer:object:read.

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>]

> From: David Taylor <dtaylor@emc.com>
> cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 12:51:59 -0400
> 
> > Finally, it looks to me that we should move the description of the
> > responses to precede the details of the 'read' requests, since the
> > list of those requests is very long, and thus the promised description
> > of the responses "below" is very far away, which IMO gets in the way
> > of reading and comprehending the issue.
> > 
> > > Now, can we come up with better wording?
> > 
> > After we've figured out the above left-overs, sure.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> I didn't pay attention to that as it was far enough after the text in
> question and looked -- at quick glance -- like it was part of the osdata
> description and therefore not relevant to threads.
> 
> Taking a longer look, it clearly is relevant.
> 
> It addresses most of my concerns and moving it, as you suggested, would
> definitely, IMO, help.

I already moved it.  If you think something still needs to be
augmented there, please tell what that is.

Thanks.