This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 8/8] New test about step over clone syscall


On 02/19/2016 12:36 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
This patch adds a new test for stepping over clone syscall.

2016-02-19  Yao Qi  <yao.qi@linaro.org>

	* gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp (step_over_syscall): Kfail.
	Invoke step_over_syscall "clone".
	* gdb.base/step-over-clone.c: New file.
---
  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-clone.c     | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp | 17 +++++++++
  2 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-clone.c

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-clone.c b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-clone.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..43b1933
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-clone.c
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
+
+   Copyright 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <sched.h>
+
+static void
+marker () {}
+
+#define STACK_SIZE 0x1000
+
+static int
+clone_fn (void *unused)
+{
+  return 0;
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  int i, pid;
+  unsigned char *stack[6];
+
+  for (i = 0; i < (sizeof (stack) / sizeof (stack[0])); i++)
+    stack[i] = malloc (STACK_SIZE);
+
+  for (i = 0; i < (sizeof (stack) / sizeof (stack[0])); i++)
+    {
+      pid = clone (clone_fn, stack[i] + STACK_SIZE, CLONE_FILES | CLONE_VM,
+		   NULL);
+    }
+
+  for (i = 0; i < (sizeof (stack) / sizeof (stack[0])); i++)
+    free (stack[i]);
+
+  marker ();
+}
diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp
index 863194b..e5a3d55 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/step-over-syscall.exp
@@ -122,6 +122,13 @@ proc step_over_syscall { syscall } {
  	foreach displaced $disp_step_opts {
  	    with_test_prefix "displaced $displaced" {

+		if { $displaced == "on" && $syscall == "clone" } {
+		    # GDB doesn't support step over clone syscall with

"...stepping over clone ..."?

+		    # displaced stepping.
+		    kfail "gdb/19675" "single step over clone"
+		    continue
+		}
+
  		gdb_test "continue" \
  		    "Continuing\\..*Breakpoint \[0-9\]+, (.* in |__libc_|)$syscall \\(\\).*" \
  		    "continue to $syscall (3rd time)"
@@ -187,6 +194,15 @@ proc step_over_syscall { syscall } {
  			}
  		    }

+		if { $syscall == "clone" } {
+		    # Create a breakpoint in the child with the condition
+		    # which is false, so that GDBserver can get the
+		    # event from the child but GDB doesn't see it.  In
+		    # this way, we don't have to adjust test flow for

"... to adjust the test flow..."?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]