This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 4/7] py-symbol: Require a frame for lookup_symbol only when necessary


On 04/02/16 17:29, jeffm@suse.com wrote:
> From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com> > > gdbpy_lookup_symbol requires a frame prior to doing the symbol lookup but > a frame isn't necessary for many symbol types.  Calling > symbol_read_needs_frame will tell us if it's necessary but we need to > have already looked up the symbol to use it.  This patch puts the > lookup first and then only resolves the frame if one is required. > > This allows us to lookup static symbols directly from python rather > than using gdb.eval_and_parse.

Please add documentation and further tests for new functionality.

> --- >  gdb/python/py-symbol.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++-------------- >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gdb/python/py-symbol.c b/gdb/python/py-symbol.c > index cbbc9e2..c7f0ff8 100644 > --- a/gdb/python/py-symbol.c > +++ b/gdb/python/py-symbol.c > @@ -382,14 +382,28 @@ gdbpy_lookup_symbol (PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kw) >  >    if (block_obj) >      block = block_object_to_block (block_obj); > -  else > + > +  TRY > +    { > +      symbol = lookup_symbol (name, block, (domain_enum) domain, > +                  &is_a_field_of_this).symbol; > +    } > +  CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL) > +    { > +      GDB_PY_HANDLE_EXCEPTION (except); > +    } > +  END_CATCH > + > +  if (symbol && !block) >      { >        struct frame_info *selected_frame; >  >        TRY >      { > -      selected_frame = get_selected_frame (_("No frame selected.")); > -      block = get_frame_block (selected_frame, NULL); > +      if
(symbol_read_needs_frame(symbol)) {

Formatting nit, space after function name and before (.

> +        selected_frame = get_selected_frame (_("No frame selected.")); > +        block = get_frame_block (selected_frame, NULL); > +      } >      } >        CATCH (except, RETURN_MASK_ALL) >      { > @@ -398,17 +412,6 @@ gdbpy_lookup_symbol (PyObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kw) >        END_CATCH >      }

My only concern here is (and the context is not meaningful enough to
see), is that you've removed an "else" above which is an unconditional
branch, and replaced it with an IF instead. What happens when both IFs
can fail?

Cheers

Phil




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]