This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] [ARM] Remove field syscall_next_pc in struct gdbarch_tdep


Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> writes:

> Maybe it's only in the email ? but it seems like it's
>
> static CORE_ADDR
>   arm_linux_get_next_pcs_syscall_next_pc (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,
>
> When it should be :
>
> static CORE_ADDR
> arm_linux_get_next_pcs_syscall_next_pc (struct arm_get_next_pcs *self,

No, it is intended.  We don't write declaration at column zero.  See
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Internals%20GDB-C-Coding-Standards

-- 
Yao (éå)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]