This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 3/5] Add support for ARM breakpoint types in GDBServer.


Antoine Tremblay <antoine.tremblay@ericsson.com> writes:

> This will contain more stuff as I post the next patch sets for single
> stepping etc.. I would like to keep a more general name.
>
> It's basically all coming from arm-tdep.c but I don't want to name it
> common/arm-tdep.c to avoid confusion and Makefile problems.
>
> arm-ctdep.c ?
>

How about arm.c?

>> Please move this file to arch/ directory rather than common/
>
> It seems weird to me to have common objects somewhere else then in
> common/ , if common becomes more a lib we don't want it all over the
> place no ?
>
> Would creating a common/arch be acceptable ? I guess we would have to
> move things like x86-xstate.h etc.. there too ?

common/ was created in order to share code between GDB and GDBserver, see
https://sourceware.org/gdb/wiki/Common After that, we find that we'll
end up with moving most of gdb files into common/ and we'd better move
different common things into different common directory.  Nowadays, we
have nat/ common/ and arch/ directories for common things.  arm.c should
be put in arch/ directory.

>>> diff --git a/gdb/configure.tgt b/gdb/configure.tgt
>>> index c42b4df..e831f59 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/configure.tgt
>>> +++ b/gdb/configure.tgt
>>> @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ arm*-wince-pe | arm*-*-mingw32ce*)
>>>   	;;
>>>   arm*-*-linux*)
>>>   	# Target: ARM based machine running GNU/Linux
>>> -	gdb_target_obs="arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
>>> +	gdb_target_obs="arm-common.o arm-tdep.o arm-linux-tdep.o glibc-tdep.o \
>>>   			solib-svr4.o symfile-mem.o linux-tdep.o linux-record.o"
>>>   	build_gdbserver=yes
>>
>> since arm-common.o is moved out of arm-tdep.o, so it should be added to
>> every target which uses arm-tdep.o, such as aarch64*-*-linux*,
>> arm*-wince-pe, etc.
>
> Even if they don't use it ? But ok.
>

No, they use it.  This patch moves thumb_insn_size to arm-common.o, but
thumb_insn_size is used by arm-tdep.c.  If we don't add arm-common.o to
every target which uses arm-tdep.o, the build will fail on these targets

build/gdb/aarch64/gdb/../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c:846: undefined reference to `thumb_insn_size'
build/gdb/aarch64/gdb/../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c:846: undefined reference to `thumb_insn_size'
arm-tdep.o: In function `arm_adjust_breakpoint_address':
build/gdb/aarch64/gdb/../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c:5417: undefined reference to `thumb_insn_size'
build/gdb/aarch64/gdb/../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c:5467: undefined reference to `thumb_insn_size'
arm-tdep.o: In function `arm_breakpoint_from_pc':
build/gdb/aarch64/gdb/../../../../binutils-gdb/gdb/arm-tdep.c:8858: undefined reference to `thumb_insn_size'

>>
>>> diff --git a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c
>>> index 367c704..15ecb70 100644
>>> --- a/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c
>>> +++ b/gdb/gdbserver/linux-arm-low.c
>>> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
>>>   #include "nat/gdb_ptrace.h"
>>>   #include <signal.h>
>>>
>>> +#include "common/arm-common.h"
>>> +
>>>   /* Defined in auto-generated files.  */
>>>   void init_registers_arm (void);
>>>   extern const struct target_desc *tdesc_arm;
>>> @@ -234,19 +236,28 @@ arm_set_pc (struct regcache *regcache, CORE_ADDR pc)
>>>   }
>>>
>>>   /* Correct in either endianness.  */
>>> -static const unsigned long arm_breakpoint = 0xef9f0001;
>>> -#define arm_breakpoint_len 4
>>> -static const unsigned short thumb_breakpoint = 0xde01;
>>> -static const unsigned short thumb2_breakpoint[] = { 0xf7f0, 0xa000 };
>>> +#define arm_abi_breakpoint 0xef9f0001UL
>>>
>>>   /* For new EABI binaries.  We recognize it regardless of which ABI
>>>      is used for gdbserver, so single threaded debugging should work
>>>      OK, but for multi-threaded debugging we only insert the current
>>>      ABI's breakpoint instruction.  For now at least.  */
>>> -static const unsigned long arm_eabi_breakpoint = 0xe7f001f0;
>>> +#define arm_eabi_breakpoint 0xe7f001f0UL
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __ARM_EABI__
>>> +static const unsigned long arm_breakpoint = arm_abi_breakpoint;
>>> +#else
>>> +static const unsigned long arm_breakpoint = arm_eabi_breakpoint;
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> +#define arm_breakpoint_len 4
>>> +static const unsigned short thumb_breakpoint = 0xde01;
>>> +#define thumb_breakpoint_len 2
>>> +static const unsigned short thumb2_breakpoint[] = { 0xf7f0, 0xa000 };
>>> +#define thumb2_breakpoint_len 4
>>
>> I am confused by your changes here.  Why do you change them?
>>
>
> Before arm_breakpoint_from_pc would be :
>
> #ifndef __ARM_EABI__
>   return (const unsigned char *) &arm_breakpoint;
> #else
> -  return (const unsigned char *) &arm_eabi_breakpoint;
> #endif
>
> And arm_breakpoint_at would check for the arm_breakpoint ||
> arm_eabi_breakpoint.
>
> Thus the selected arm_breakpoint would be what that function returned
> and arm_breakpoint was arm_abi_breakpoint.
>
> It felt more clear to me to name those for what they are : 2 separate
> entities arm_abi_breakpoint and arm_eabi_breakpoint and set the
> current used one as arm_breakpoint.
>
> This allows a cleaner breakpoint_from_pc as it just returns
> arm_breakpoint rather than having the #ifdef in that function.
>
> Any other reference to the arm_breakpoint would also be clear of #ifdefs...

Please don't combine movement and refactoring.  This patch is about
movement, so let us do movement only.  Refactor can be done separately.

-- 
Yao (éå)


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]