This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Looks like historical restructuring in this dir lost the d10v-elf subdir > and no one noticed in the meantime. Wow... And no port maintainer to frown at. > Re-add it to the testsuite. > > There are some failures, but better some tests get run than none at all. Meh... I agree it should be enabled, but as this particular harness doesn't summarize the results, the value of a passing subset is much lessened... (I have to disable d10v sim testing -i.e. just building it- in my sim autotester, which is all-must-pass-or-nothing anyway.) Is the attached sim d10v-elf testsuite run log consistent with your results? A "grep -c Error log" yields 25, FWIW. brgds, H-P
Attachment:
log
Description: Binary data
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |