This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Provide the ability to write the frame unwinder in Python
- From: Andy Wingo <wingo at igalia dot com>
- To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
- Cc: Alexander Smundak <asmundak at google dot com>, gdb-patches <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 10:05:58 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Provide the ability to write the frame unwinder in Python
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAHQ51u7NUoQ8w9c5mc-Eiz05b1Nub6zqj_Ne7vfgWb5EP9_X8w at mail dot gmail dot com> <21714 dot 40641 dot 510825 dot 30998 at ruffy2 dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com> <CAHQ51u5_ViLaEmv9e43R-wzuWw8dwNkb-2XgCRy5ELQq5FUAWg at mail dot gmail dot com> <54E71694 dot 1080304 at redhat dot com> <CAHQ51u75+9HYAVJXYNQa0gTnQtYKEgmSkyAhAPYp-y4HGtXssg at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAHQ51u6UZ7A47rpGgX0QGeYSTCz1eo_3jWHc=q2ZX3YhqcJ6iQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87ioei31uj dot fsf at igalia dot com> <CAHQ51u4f+Vx7qXPm-KAAENOceaVogMbDMw6==N_nY+GrLr4Pgg at mail dot gmail dot com> <87d24p19tt dot fsf at igalia dot com> <54FD7DAA dot 7010603 at redhat dot com> <CAHQ51u7sUkGhkmvTaaO_Jo6Jn+kojfiMWHmc2=7OWHThAq6EKw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87twxrncld dot fsf at igalia dot com> <CAHQ51u60nHp1a2DXZ4srvRefyTtge1BUw7-=JuYqChHN_wUGyQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87ioe1dvu2 dot fsf at igalia dot com> <CAHQ51u7KzQLSLC=QeLA=zd+TUkbbNzzndfeVLFWpjiR-pL8ang at mail dot gmail dot com> <87sid4atms dot fsf at igalia dot com> <CAHQ51u6=9BKf6YSTavbY7u_Mi6miKJ_Yo1QcaG=KsYtYzoWY_Q at mail dot gmail dot com> <CAHQ51u4ybxem1X89G7frW-N_gZK6q3rKLunxgf+7UPzpswCfNg at mail dot gmail dot com> <87r3smado6 dot fsf at igalia dot com> <CAHQ51u6+sCwSi3dYQXsz7orjq-yGjX6PayQduwVURx3DxpK=oA at mail dot gmail dot com> <21776 dot 28787 dot 615626 dot 171251 at ruffy2 dot mtv dot corp dot google dot com>
Hi,
Replying for comments that affect the Guile patch.
On Mon 23 Mar 2015 20:58, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
> Andy: Can we forgo priorities for now until we have a use-case and thus
> something concrete to base them on?
Sure.
> > +@node Unwinding Frames in Python
> > +@subsubsection Unwinding Frames in Python
> > +@cindex Unwinding frames in Python.
>
> IWBN if the Scheme and Python sides had similar text,
> but let's leave that until both patches are in.
> Then someone (maybe myself) can go back and edit them.
ACK
Andy