This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On 20 Mar 2015 11:50, Joel Brobecker wrote: > > > > 2015-03-19 James Bowman <james.bowman@ftdichip.com> > > > > > > > > * sim-ft32.h: New file, FT32 simulator/GDB interface. > > > > > > Shouldn't this part of the "sim" patch? (which means that the GDB > > > part would be conditional on the "sim" part being pushed first). > > > > only gdb uses this header to interface with the sim directly, so it could go > > either way > > Doesn't the sim need that header too - I would think the point of > having the definitions be there would be to make sure that sim and > GDB are in sync? the sim currently duplicates the defines, but it prob should include it directly -mike
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |