This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: we have now switched to new git hooks (was: "Re: RFC: using AdaCore's git hooks for binutils-gdb.git ...")
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GDB <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:56:26 +0400
- Subject: Re: ANNOUNCEMENT: we have now switched to new git hooks (was: "Re: RFC: using AdaCore's git hooks for binutils-gdb.git ...")
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20141128135756 dot GK548 at adacore dot com> <20141207142138 dot GJ7899 at adacore dot com> <20141213165103 dot GA26944 at adacore dot com> <20141214204731 dot GA15244 at adacore dot com> <20141221224607 dot GN12884 at adacore dot com> <20150105041322 dot GB23617 at adacore dot com> <20150110065853 dot GS5445 at adacore dot com> <CAMe9rOp2GGp6e-i38N-hBdOeuc-SMx5rsAE2wGxCL9W5y6p9mw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20150112045849 dot GW5445 at adacore dot com> <CAMe9rOp8m_xNGju4-8PrbZum=NCCZN04=CREZjfomRX21VS8=w at mail dot gmail dot com>
> The bugzilla entry doesn't show which branch the commit was
> applied into.
That's because I piped the output of "git show" to the script
that files it (which is also why the diff accidently made it
to bugzilla) - in other words, I didn't use the hooks, just
called the script by hand. Future updates will have the name
of the branch.
> I committed the fix into both master and 2.25 branches. There is
> only one bugzilla entry for my commits.
Just file a comment that says you also pushed to the binutils 2.25
branch as well, explaining why you had to do it this way.
--
Joel