This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: --with-babeltrace generates many FAILs


On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:39:26 +0200, Yao Qi wrote:
> I can reproduce it on my Fedora 20 x86 machine.  Let me know it
> works for you or not.

Yes, it works for me (Fedora 21pre x86_64).

Just suggesting:

 * '#if HAVE_LIBBABELTRACE1_1_0' could have a comment that >=1.1.1 rejects the
   faked packet (what you described in the mail but not in the patch).

 * It is always better to check for feature/defect than to check for version.
   For example because various distros backport various fixes (unfortunately
   including their possible regressions/defects) and so version checks may be
   misleading then.  At least in this case it seems to me as possible to check
   how libbacktrace behaves from configure; although maybe it is not easy
   enough, not sure.


Thanks,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]