This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: gdb-7.8 branching status (2014-06-04)
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 17:06:53 +0100
- Subject: Re: gdb-7.8 branching status (2014-06-04)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <20140604171843 dot GX30686 at adacore dot com> <539080E5 dot 9000405 at codesourcery dot com>
On 06/05/2014 03:38 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
> On 06/05/2014 01:18 AM, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> Quick update on where we are on branching the gdb-7.8 branch:
>
> I tested gdb head on both arm-none-eabi and arm-none-linux-gnueabi
> yesterday. Except gdb.cp/koenig.exp fail, there is no regression.
> However, there are some new fails (compared with 7.7.1), but none of
> them are blockers, IMO.
>
> New FAIL: default/gdb.sum:gdb.base/hbreak-unmapped.exp: hbreak *0
> New FAIL: default/gdb.sum:gdb.base/hbreak-unmapped.exp: info break shows
> hw breakpoint
>
> bare metal target isn't consider in this case, and I've proposed here
> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2014-06/msg00074.html
TBC, this is just a test issue, not a GDB bug. I've followed up now.
>
> FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: finish&
> FAIL: gdb.base/async.exp: nexti&
> FAIL: gdb.threads/sigstep-threads.exp: continue
> FAIL: gdb.threads/sigstep-threads.exp: step 2
> FAIL: gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp: sizeof (*e) in test forced_stabs
> FAIL: gdb.stabs/gdb11479.exp: sizeof (*e) in test2 forced_stabs
> FAIL: gdb.base/jit.exp: PIE: one_jit_test-1: continue to breakpoint:
> break here 2 (the program exited)
None of these ring a bell to me atm.
> I'll take a look.
Thanks.
--
Pedro Alves