This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [Windows]Fix a bug which cause GDB.exe assert when try to run the inferior
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: asmwarrior at gmail dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:07:23 +0200
- Subject: Re: [Windows]Fix a bug which cause GDB.exe assert when try to run the inferior
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <530612A8 dot 4000903 at gmail dot com> <5306A9BC dot 4080701 at codesourcery dot com> <5306EE2A dot 2060103 at gmail dot com> <5306FA43 dot 1070408 at codesourcery dot com> <83sirc532m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <530706DD dot 8060605 at codesourcery dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:57:17 +0800
> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> CC: <asmwarrior@gmail.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>
> On 02/21/2014 03:37 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 15:03:31 +0800
> >> From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
> >> CC: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
> >>
> >> 2014-02-21 Yuanhui Zhang <asmwarrior@gmail.com>
> >>
> >> * windows-nat.c (windows_xfer_shared_libraries): Return
> >> TARGET_XFER_EOF if LEN is zero.
> >
> > Indeed. May I also suggest to point to the details of the underlying
> > problem, or include its summary, in the ChangeLog entry?
> >
>
> I prefer to put the details of the underlying problem in commit log,
> but I am fine to include its summary in the ChangeLog entry.
>
> How about this?
Looks good to me, thanks.