This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- From: Mark H Weaver <mhw at netris dot org>
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- Cc: ludo at gnu dot org (Ludovic CourtÃs), guile-devel at gnu dot org, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 02:50:36 -0500
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Improved ^c support for gdb/guile
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <wrbvbwejihe dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <wrbr471jxjg dot fsf at sspiff dot org> <834n3x8o7m dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMSE+vNpG2nJNKNQk3QfQHV=cqRdEGmv7T3eEcgQ0cTyFQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <83y519788a dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CAP9bCMQiZurfMyU-qA9LEy_6_BOyRE1-dke93_m505EHuNZrAA at mail dot gmail dot com> <871tz0d5vc dot fsf at gnu dot org> <83iosc76kz dot fsf at gnu dot org>
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> Also, since the only way I could get a functional MinGW Guile was to
> configure it without threads, I would suggest that this be the default
> for MinGW, but that isn't a big deal.
FWIW, the situation seems to have improved since you last looked. In
the last couple of weeks, madsy on #guile reported cross-building a
recent Guile snapshot (stable-2.0 branch) using MinGW, with thread
support enabled and without --disable-posix, and it seems to work
reasonably well. It runs the REPL without problems and passes much of
the test suite.
Mark