This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] RFC: All stepping threads need the same checks and cleanup as the currently stepping thread


On 02/07/2014 07:52 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 01/23/2014 06:53 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> 
>> > There's a spot in resume that uses
>> > step_after_step_resume_breakpoint too (for software
>> > single-step targets), that I haven't really given much
>> > thought yet.  It might well need something there too.
> So I've stared at that piece of code, and I'm not seeing
> anything that would need to change.

I forgot to mention, but for the archives, I also
tested the patch against a software single-step target
(or rather my series that makes x86-64 use that).
The new test fails before the patch there too, and
passes after.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]