This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] relocate the entry point addess when used


>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Tom> I think the existing code here is wrong.  It computes the entry point
Tom> address directly from the BFD, not applying any runtime offsets.
Tom> However, then objfile_relocate1 passes this address to find_pc_section
Tom> -- which does use the offsets .  So, it seems to me that the current
Tom> code can only find the correct address by luck.

Pedro> It's twisted, but I don't think it's luck.  You can convince yourself
Pedro> it works by debugging a PIE, and trying a backtrace past main
Pedro> ("set backtrace past-main" will then trigger the code to stop the
Pedro> backtrace at the entry point), or doing "info files" (shows the entry).

Well, what I don't understand is that most addresses in dwarf2read.c are
offset:

  baseaddr = ANOFFSET (objfile->section_offsets, SECT_OFF_TEXT (objfile));

... however this is not done for the entry point, which comes directly
from the BFD:

      objfile->per_bfd->ei.entry_point = bfd_get_start_address (objfile->obfd);

I suppose there is some other invariant ensuring that the entry point is
only computed when all the objfile offsets are zero.  This part is not
obvious to me.

[...]
Pedro> This is assuming osect ends up NULL after iterating over all.
Pedro> It's violating the abstraction of the macro.  And, actually,
Pedro> it's wrong, showing exactly why such assumptions are a bad idea:

Sorry about that, I'll fix it up locally.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]