This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
Hi Mark, What I mean is the appended patch. This is what I added on top of v7. 1. It removes MPX support for x32. 2. Improves i386-xstate.h macros. (identation was weird) 3. Fix the regression on MPX initialization on i386-tdep.cI considered that to be easy to review than having all the patch series again.
:) Thanks a lot! Best regards, -Fred Am 11/11/2013 11:08 AM, schrieb Mark Kettenis:
From: "Tedeschi, Walfred" <walfred.tedeschi@intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:15:36 +0000 Hello Mark, I am not sure I got it right. Is this a ok to commit?Pretty much.If so, I still would like to do some changes before proceeding. Basically I want to remove the x32 support since it makes no sense and a regression I caused. Those changes where mentioned here: https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2013-10/msg00513.htmlI'll await your patch then ;).To avoid sending you a full patch again my Idea is to send an ad-hoc patch to be added on top of my V7. While doing the commit then I would join then on the respective place.Not sure what you mean by that. As long as all the intermediate states compile and you don't introduce regressions for non-MPX support, this should be fine.
Intel GmbH Dornacher Strasse 1 85622 Feldkirchen/Muenchen, Deutschland Sitz der Gesellschaft: Feldkirchen bei Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Christian Lamprechter, Hannes Schwaderer, Douglas Lusk Registergericht: Muenchen HRB 47456 Ust.-IdNr./VAT Registration No.: DE129385895 Citibank Frankfurt a.M. (BLZ 502 109 00) 600119052
Attachment:
mpx_no_x32.diff
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |