This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] introduce relative_filename and use it


>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> On 10/18/2013 09:49 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> This introduces a new relative_filename proc to gdb.exp and changes
>> some tests to use it.  This helps make these tests parallel-safe.
>> 
>> * gdb.base/fullname.exp: Use standard_output_file,
>> relative_filename.
>> * gdb.base/hashline1.exp: Use standard_testfile,
>> standard_output_file, relative_filename, clean_restart.
>> * gdb.base/hashline2.exp: Use standard_testfile,
>> standard_output_file, relative_filename.
>> * gdb.base/hashline3.exp: Use standard_testfile,
>> standard_output_file, relative_filename.
>> * lib/gdb.exp (relative_filename): New proc.

Pedro> It seems like gdb.base/hashline2.exp doesn't actually use
Pedro> relative_filename.  Was that a mistake?

I looked, and it was intentional.
The test case is supposed to use absolute file names here.
I've corrected the ChangeLog entry.

Tom


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]