This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA v2/code+DOCO+NEWS] new "set/show serial baud" command
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- Cc: palves at redhat dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2013 19:44:08 +0300
- Subject: Re: [RFA v2/code+DOCO+NEWS] new "set/show serial baud" command
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <CAAyhtXRSWTdpDc4jiZ2k5zWCNUXUzRxNokN1F_aRdMfuWGsBHQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <87bo6affrh dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <524ECCBB dot 5050307 at gmail dot com> <CAAyhtXQBSOz8sjxSmqGRQNtXHeOJpszMEYhRGyBydBGr-GkZCw at mail dot gmail dot com> <20131008035636 dot GC3092 at adacore dot com> <5253F497 dot 6040709 at redhat dot com> <20131008141639 dot GF3092 at adacore dot com> <87siwbhk47 dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <20131009112334 dot GJ3092 at adacore dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 15:23:34 +0400
> From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> gdb/doc/ChangeLog:
>
> * gdb.texinfo: Replace "set remotebaud" and "show remotebaud"
> by "set serial baud" and "show serial baud" (resp) throughout.
You didn't mention the node name in the log entry.
> diff --git a/gdb/NEWS b/gdb/NEWS
> index 8114fb1..4e627b0 100644
> --- a/gdb/NEWS
> +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> @@ -200,6 +200,11 @@ qXfer:libraries-svr4:read's annex
>
> * GDB can now use Windows x64 unwinding data.
>
> +* The "set remotebaud" command has been replaced by "set serial baud".
> + Similarly, "show remotebaud" has been replaced by "show serial baud".
> + The "set remotebaud" and "show remotebaud" commands are still available
> + to provide backward compatibility with older versions of GDB.
> +
This is OK.
> If you're using a serial line, you may want to give @value{GDBN} the
> -@w{@samp{--baud}} option, or use the @code{set remotebaud} command
> -(@pxref{Remote Configuration, set remotebaud}) before the
> +@w{@samp{--baud}} option, or use the @code{set serial baud} command
Is @w really needed here? You have only one word there anyway.
Otherwise, OK for the documentation parts.
Thanks.