This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [RFA] gdbserver/win32-low.c: Check Read/WriteProcessMemory return value (followup to [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function)
- From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
- To: Pierre Muller <pierre dot muller at ics-cnrs dot unistra dot fr>
- Cc: "'Pedro Alves'" <palves at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 15:19:38 +0100
- Subject: Re: [RFA] gdbserver/win32-low.c: Check Read/WriteProcessMemory return value (followup to [RFA] windows-nat.c: Handle ERROR_PARTIAL_COPY in windows_xfer_memory function)
- Authentication-results: sourceware.org; auth=none
- References: <5223bb46 dot c6c0420a dot 5a41 dot 008dSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN at mx dot google dot com> <52248978 dot 90500 at redhat dot com> <000301cea7dd$17bc4af0$4734e0d0$ at muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <52249053 dot 6050103 at redhat dot com> <522494dc dot 297a420a dot 6ab0 dot 6047SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN at mx dot google dot com> <522497AF dot 8080800 at redhat dot com> <52249a22 dot 42bd420a dot 28f1 dot 722cSMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN at mx dot google dot com> <52249C06 dot 1020100 at redhat dot com> <52249e27 dot e8a4420a dot 4293 dot ffff89a0SMTPIN_ADDED_BROKEN at mx dot google dot com>
On 09/02/2013 03:18 PM, Pierre Muller wrote:
> The problem is that TARGET_XFER_E_IO
> is only defined in gdb/target.h...
>
> Should I just replace TARGET_XFER_E_IO by -1 and keep the gdb version
> otherwise?
Yep.
Thanks,
--
Pedro Alves