This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] introduce parallel mode
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 21:44:03 +0300
- Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] introduce parallel mode
- References: <1375457773-863-1-git-send-email-tromey at redhat dot com> <1375457773-863-5-git-send-email-tromey at redhat dot com> <834nb8yntk dot fsf at gnu dot org> <87mwp0c52c dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 12:37:15 -0600
>
> >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
> >> Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2013 09:36:13 -0600
> >>
> >> * gdbint.texinfo (Testsuite): Use @table, not @itemize.
>
> Eli> I wonder why.
>
> The list is really a 2-column table -- each @item introduces a runtest
> variable and then defines its purpose. This is what @table is for.
> If you look at the current code, it uses @item @code{...}
> for each one, which I think is a clue that it is incorrect.
I don't think it's incorrect. Using @code doesn't mean it has to be a
table.
But I won't fight. I just don't like unnecessary changes.