This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] not trigger pagination with dprintf
- From: Hui Zhu <teawater at gmail dot com>
- To: gdb-patches ml <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>, Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>, tromey at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 19:21:06 +0800
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] not trigger pagination with dprintf
- References: <CANFwon2V2vVADH89czoQjS+F=Uxsc5AgMAsQ3=d0nohc2EfBpA at mail dot gmail dot com> <87zjwuv0qn dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CANFwon1kWpR9mhGVbzf0qB4GqO89yN+Uj9jGUHpp2-kWWmFC4g at mail dot gmail dot com> <87li87ll0r dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CANFwon2jNppHObCEac=aSU6Uq6KLaoC5PGS8Vi3LawA+xzOJ=A at mail dot gmail dot com> <87fvyd827o dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CANFwon1m=hRBz22GLGa_CpWCYZ874K1P7mCEyYXHVc4T84U17A at mail dot gmail dot com> <CADPb22Qz2tBWQmis=VbgXexNnYiqos2A1pBgeNN_NZtdQ=VtuQ at mail dot gmail dot com> <CANFwon3HJye8SdLL8jV8H7-g-BipNON6+oS2p8J=QpnnrXbdFA at mail dot gmail dot com> <83k3naeodd dot fsf at gnu dot org> <CADPb22SD8H0HmopqHY7iFbFE+xFE2X092XgcBXeJ5CNm-W_Rgw at mail dot gmail dot com> <87sj1yu0hj dot fsf at fleche dot redhat dot com> <CADPb22QFRg8scQD_=Wx2e1DGjAakXY5f9kbfwo0UbZ6DwejqmA at mail dot gmail dot com> <83d2t2ejan dot fsf at gnu dot org>
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 2:28 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Date: Tue, 7 May 2013 11:10:25 -0700
>> From: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, Hui Zhu <teawater@gmail.com>,
>> gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
>>
>> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:
>> >
>> > Doug> I'm kinda on the fence, and I'd like to hear what other GMs think.
>> >
>> > I still don't understand what is wrong with asking the user to disable
>> > pagination if that is what is desired. Maybe the user actually wants
>> > pagination sometimes.
>>
>> Me neither.
>> For the sake of discussion,
>> One could turn it around, however, and phrase the question as
>> "What should the default be while executing breakpoint commands?"
>
> What we do today, I guess, which means ON.
What I thought is:
Plan A, post "set pagination on" to 15182 as workaround. And update
doc add some introduce to dprintf part about that if need.
Plan B, add a switch to current patch that can switch on and off of
pagination with commands. It also need update doc for that.
I prefer A. What about you?
Thanks,
Hui