This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
So, I'm suggesting that sending an MI event from GDB to the frontend for every dprintf hit is too much. Does the same argument hold for async remote notifications? For efficiency, I'm thinking that agent dprintf should not report every hit to GDB; instead, when GDB wants to know the hit count (e.g, because of a -break-list command), it would ask the agent for the current hit count. This would cut down on the communication from agent to GDB when using dprintf.
-- Yao (éå)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |