This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patchv3 13/11] Make relative-with-system-absolute the default
- From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 20:27:05 +0200
- Subject: Re: [patchv3 13/11] Make relative-with-system-absolute the default
- References: <20130129221118.GB27463@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130130074859.GB15998@host2.jankratochvil.net> <831ud2ioax.fsf@gnu.org> <20130202180658.GA16269@host2.jankratochvil.net>
- Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 19:06:58 +0100
> From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
>
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 18:16:38 +0100, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > > --- a/gdb/NEWS
> > > +++ b/gdb/NEWS
> > > @@ -119,7 +119,9 @@ set filename-display basename|relative|absolute|relative-with-system-absolute
> > > |basename-with-system-absolute
> > > show filename-display
> > > Control the way in which filenames is displayed.
> > > - The default is "relative", which preserves previous behavior.
> > > + Previous behavior was "relative".
> > > + New default is "relative-with-system-absolute", which prints source filenames
> > > + from files with present separate debug info in absolute form.
> >
> > I believe "present" should be removed from here.
>
> I will remove it but it was present there to highlight it does not apply to
> files with separated debug info where the separate debug info is currently not
> installed. Although in such case no source filename is printed at all so it
> is irrelevant whether it would be printed in absolute or relative form.
Yes, I believe your last sentence is the reason why this detail does
not need to be mentioned.