This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: RFC: implement "catch signal"


On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:25:06 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
> I went through all the catchpoints and added a new "catch-type" field
> that lists the type of catchpoint.

Therefore it looks this way?

body=[bkpt={number="1",type="catchpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",catch-type="signal",what=[signal="SIGINT",signal="SIGTRAP"],times="0"}]

I believe it still may break existing MI clients according to AndrÃ.

This one would be safer:

body=[bkpt={number="1",type="catchpoint",disp="keep",enabled="y",catch-type="signal",what="<signal>",signal=["SIGINT","SIGTRAP"],times="0"}]

Although it is becoming very "unusual".


> Let me know what you think of this.

I find more safe the latter choice but I would prefer to leave the choice on
Andrà with better MI real world experience.


Thanks,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]