On 23/05/12 18:38, Stan Shebs wrote:
@{width="10",alignment="-1",col_name="col1",colhdr="Description"@}],
+body=[item=@{col0="processes",col1="Listing of all processes"@},
+ item=@{col0="procgroups",col1="Listing of all process groups"@},
+ item=@{col0="threads",col1="Listing of all threads"@},
+ item=@{col0="files",col1="Listing of all file descriptors"@},
+ item=@{col0="sockets",col1="Listing of all internet-domain
sockets"@},
+ item=@{col0="shm",col1="Listing of all shared-memory regions"@},
+ item=@{col0="semaphores",col1="Listing of all semaphores"@},
+ item=@{col0="msg",col1="Listing of all message queues"@},
+ item=@{col0="modules",col1="Listing of all loaded kernel
Stan,
I am afraid this output is not really good enough. From MI consumer
standpoint, we need a clear
and concise labels for each resource type. Unfortunately, "shm" is
not acceptable at all.
"Listing of all shared-memory regions" is unacceptably long. Besides,
this would make a good title
for a table with output, but not really good title for a menu used to
specify what to show. For
the record, here's the labels I have to use in actual UI code:
ResourceClassContributionItem_0=Processes
ResourceClassContributionItem_10=Shared memory regions
ResourceClassContributionItem_12=Semaphores
ResourceClassContributionItem_14=Message queues
ResourceClassContributionItem_16=Kernel modules
ResourceClassContributionItem_2=Process groups
ResourceClassContributionItem_4=Threads
ResourceClassContributionItem_6=Files
ResourceClassContributionItem_8=Sockets
Could GDB be made to output such labels?