This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [SH] regs command

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Thomas Schwinge <thomas at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Kevin Buettner <kevinb at redhat dot com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro at codesourcery dot com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 11:28:45 -0600
Subject: Re: [SH] regs command
References: <87ehqkrzzw.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120516142633.GV10253@adacore.com> <87zk98qe8t.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120516165730.GY10253@adacore.com> <87pqa4qbzp.fsf@schwinge.name>

>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Schwinge <thomas@codesourcery.com> writes:

Thomas> That's actually what I have tried first, but failed: due to
Thomas> add_alias_cmd returning a NULL pointer (in c), deprecated_cmd
Thomas> obviously failed.  And as we'd remove this code in a few weeks
Thomas> anyway, I decided not to spend more time on this, and instead go
Thomas> the easy route.

This means you registered "regs" before the thing it aliases was
registered.  This can happen because _initialize_xxx order is not
defined.

There's no easy fix :(.  You could move "regs" initialization to a
better spot but then it will be visible in all builds of gdb, not just
those with this target compiled in.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker

References:
- [SH] regs command
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Thomas Schwinge
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [SH] regs command
  - From: Thomas Schwinge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]