This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
RE: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
- From: Marc Khouzam <marc dot khouzam at ericsson dot com>
- To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz at gnu dot org>, "'Stan Shebs'" <stanshebs at earthlink dot net>
- Cc: "'gdb-patches at sourceware dot org'" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Wed, 2 May 2012 11:55:43 -0400
- Subject: RE: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
- References: <83vckviv3b.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419154853.GM25623@adacore.com> <83sjfzitxx.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4vjitnj.fsf@gnu.org> <20120419185329.GO25623@adacore.com> <83mx67ikxm.fsf@gnu.org> <837gx7hhxa.fsf@gnu.org> <83lilg6ysn.fsf@gnu.org> <4F9EBD0D.2090701@earthlink.net> <83k40x5eq4.fsf@gnu.org>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
> [mailto:gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org] On Behalf Of Eli Zaretskii
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:09 PM
> To: Stan Shebs
> Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Subject: Re: GDB/MI and ">" prompts
>
> > Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 09:25:49 -0700
> > From: Stan Shebs <stanshebs@earthlink.net>
> >
> > It seems logically correct... Did you try Eclipse? This is
> the kind of
> > thing that CDT's MI and console bits can be sensitive to,
> even though
> > it's not supposed to be. :-) If you haven't tried it, doing some
> > breakpoint commands (both from breakpoint window and
> console window)
> > with any recent released Eclipse should be a sufficient sniff test.
> >
> > If Eclipse is good, then this is OK to commit.
>
> Thanks. No, I didn't try Eclipse, and I don't have it handy. Perhaps
> someone else could.
I actually had to add special code in Eclipse to handle some secondary
prompt weirdness of GDB, so I think it is worth trying your patch
with Eclipse.
I don't have time right now, but I should this week.
Feel free to ping me in a couple of days if I haven't replied yet.
Marc