This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_*

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:18:16 -0600
Subject: Re: RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_*
References: <1334610821-10974-1-git-send-email-brobecker@adacore.com> <87zkaawp9g.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120417151549.GN2852@adacore.com>

Joel> Yes, I agree. I read the entire thread, and it seems so simple to
Joel> fix the problem that way as well.  I think both approaches should
Joel> be applied.

Could you test my patch, applied to an unpatched gdb, on AIX?
If it works for you I will write a ChangeLog entry and check it in.
I don't have a good way to test it here AFAIK.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_*
  - From: Joel Brobecker

References:
- RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_*
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_*
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: RFC: bfd_section should not be NULL in call to prim_record_minimal_*
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]