This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Move catch syscall to inferior-data.

From: Pedro Alves <palves at redhat dot com>
To: Yao Qi <yao at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 14:45:02 +0000
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move catch syscall to inferior-data.
References: <1331554677-12906-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <4F5DFF44.5020005@redhat.com> <4F5E049F.5040407@codesourcery.com>

On 03/12/2012 02:13 PM, Yao Qi wrote:

> On 03/12/2012 09:51 PM, Pedro Alves wrote:
>>>> After trying some different methods, I realize that it is not a good
>>>> way to put "DEF_VEC_I(foo)" in header file.
>>
>> Right.  Just put DEF_VEC_I(int) in gdb_vecs.h and include that in
>> places that need it.
> 
> Right, gdb_vecs.h can guarantee each DEF_VEC_I is included only once.

> IMO, this patch is still beneficial, because inferior.h is de-coupled

> from breakpoint.h with this patch applied.


It's never completely decoupled as other parts of inferior control
need to know about catch syscall, but, patch is okay.

-- 
Pedro Alves

References:
- [PATCH] Move catch syscall to inferior-data.
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [PATCH] Move catch syscall to inferior-data.
  - From: Pedro Alves
- Re: [PATCH] Move catch syscall to inferior-data.
  - From: Yao Qi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]