This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 #3
- From: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
- To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 06:45:32 +0400
- Subject: Re: [patch] Fix gdb.cp/gdb2495.exp regression with gcc-4.7 #3
- References: <20111222202047.GA16110@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111227045606.GE23376@adacore.com> <20111228161208.GB10556@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111228180148.GA18057@host2.jankratochvil.net> <201112282009.pBSK9LHn029918@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20111229231251.GA27794@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111230033020.GA20473@adacore.com> <20111230111104.GA21767@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120101222147.GA23665@host2.jankratochvil.net>
> FYI do you still plan the 7.4 release tomorrow? For example this should go in
> IMO, gcc-4.7 will be GA (and for example gcc-4.7 built Fedora 17 GA is
> 2012-05-08), both before gdb-7.5 will be GA, just the HEAD files are not
> rotated yet for 2012.
I am not planning on releaing GDB on the 2nd anymore. There are a couple
of patches from me, and maybe this one. For yours, there's been enough
scrutiny I think that it can go in I think that it can go in already.
PS: For the ChangeLog on the branch, yeah, no point in rotating it.
It'd be a very small ChangeLog in the end. However, we do need
to be careful with copyright dates, I believe. Applying the E-o-Y
procedure takes a lot of time, and so doing on the branch as well
would be a bit of a waste.
--
Joel