This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs [Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp]

From: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>, Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 11:28:15 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs [Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp]
References: <20111205081911.GG28486@adacore.com> <m34nxdoawj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111209171630.GA30059@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111209171937.GA30594@host2.jankratochvil.net> <m3wra5ebvq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111209215319.GA5132@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111210160145.GA7261@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211024742.GN21915@adacore.com> <20111211092552.GA14574@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20111211124213.GO21915@adacore.com> <20111214185650.GA8485@host2.jankratochvil.net>

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Jan Kratochvil
<jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2011 13:42:13 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
>> This is why I would say it's convenient to use KFAIL for GDB bugs only.
>
> I somehow have the same opinion and Tom declined reply, I will check this in
> with no reply:

Can someone check into gdbint.texi definitions of xfail and kfail?
There's a section "Writing Tests", seems like an appropriate place.

Follow-Ups:
- [doc patch] gdbint: XFAIL vs. KFAIL [Re: [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

References:
- creating the gdb-7.4 branch tomorrow (?)
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: creating the gdb-7.4 branch tomorrow (?)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types [Re: creating the gdb-7.4 branch tomorrow (?)]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp [Re: Regression for gdb.base/sigstep.exp with .debug_types]
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- [patch] gcc KFAILs to XFAILs [Re: [commit] testsuite: KFAIL gdb.cp/static-method.exp]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]