This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro at codesourcery dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>
Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:55:21 -0700
Subject: Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]
References: <m31usz3la9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <201111251608.pAPG81oE002175@d06av02.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com> <20111202011800.GA23680@host2.jankratochvil.net> <m3hb19ea0e.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20111209212530.GA4306@host2.jankratochvil.net>

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

Jan> On Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:00:01 +0100, Tom Tromey wrote:
>> Unfortunately, a Tcl proc returns its last computed value if there is no
>> explicit return.  So, this caused:

Jan> With the patch of mine it either returns the same value as before or it
Jan> returns value 0.  And I do not have the problem reproducible, where to
Jan> reproduce it?

I will look at it on Monday.
Sorry for not investigating more before sending the email.

Tom

References:
- [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil
- Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [patch] testsuite: Fix mi-solib.exp without debuginfos [Re: [3/3] RFC: fix PR mi/8444]
  - From: Jan Kratochvil

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]