This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] New test+use texinfo @click - @HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK@ [Re: doc build failure (Re: [patch 04/12] entryval#3: Virtual tail call frames)]
On Monday 10 October 2011 15:57:49, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> +@ifset HAVE_MAKEINFO_CLICK
> +The code can have possible execution paths
> +@clicksequence{main@click{}a@click{}b@click{}c@click{}d@click{}f} or
> +@clicksequence{main@click{}a@click{}b@click{}e@click{}f}, @value{GDBN} cannot find which
> one from the inferior state.
> +@end ifset
Leaving a piece of the manual out like that is not okay.
If this feature is too new for the currently required makeinfo
version (which is it, btw?), we have two real choices:
1. bump the minimum required makeinfo version so we can use it
2. don't use the new feature
We could also have an @else that spells that bit out without
using @click/@arrow, but I don't think the benefits of a
clicksequence (or @arrow) justify the extra maintenance
burden. IMO.
--
Pedro Alves