Re: [RFC] stept, nextt, finisht, untilt, continuet

[Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>]

On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 12:01:27 +0200, pfee@talk21.com wrote:
> I like the 'step' mode of scheduler-locking, but often wish it applied to the 
> "next" command, not just step.

I agree, it does not apply to the continue-over-call part of `next'.  But that
is a bug which should be fixed.


> My suggestion would be to create a "set scheduler-locking next" mode in which 
> both "step" and "next" operate with other threads locked out.

Do you think the "step" mode would be still useful if "next" exists?


Thanks,
Jan