This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] 12843


On Monday 29 August 2011 13:17:02, André Pönitz wrote:
> On Monday 29 August 2011 12:12:53 ext Pedro Alves wrote:
> > > Just using new flags for the parameters should do the trick in this case.
> > 
> > Yeah, though I expect frontends to support letting the user specify
> > manually where to insert the breakpoint (say, with a popup dialog
> > where you write foo.exe:bar or something more complicated, 
> 
> It's the IDE's job to capture the user's intentions, i.e. either let the
> user provide explicit information about the kind of the breakpoint 
> (file and line, function, 'on throw' etc) directly in the dialog, or do 
> the kind of linespec parsing gdb currently does (which feels pretty
> unnatural for a "normal" GUI user who typically does not even want
> to know what kind of debugging "backend" is used.

I'd say the latter is arguable.  Note I did not suggest that new switches
like --file and --line would be bad, I even agreed!
As long as the old form works, looks like everyone will be happy?

Thanks,
-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]