This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: comments formatting [Re: [patch] physname regression: Non-matching type false breakpoint]


On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 19:15:32 +0200, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote:
>    OK (in VIM it is gq} or gqip ).  I use 79 columns instead of 70.
>    So in the case of 70 columns what would be the right formatting of:
> 
>    /* The strchr check is there if any types were specified verify the single found found parameter types really match those specified by user in COPY.  */

This is not a quote of my text, I wrote:
     /* The strchr check is there if any verify the single found found parameter foo types really match those specified by user in COPY.  */

See:
	http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-06/msg00074.html


> It would be the one I produced in the previous email:

The text I provided was specially crafted to hit the same problem with 70
columns as I faced with the 79 columns and as I / others will face in the
future.

When the GNU Coding Standard does describe the comments formatting rules one
has to unfortunately reverse engineer them from Emacs.


Thanks,
Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]