This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [unavailable regs/locals, 01/11] registers status upwards


On Thursday 17 March 2011 16:31:26, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:21:48 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > How about proceeding as is, and I'll revisit later if necessary?
> > This is just _one_ detail in the whole story afterall.
> 
> I do not want to block anything.  But in such case a review does not make
> sense as it is easier to put there compiler and/or exception checks than to
> verify each statement by humans.

Okay, thanks.  I do respect and understand your point.  I mainly
disagree that the existing functions are the ones that should throw.
I'll try to see about adding throwing variants (and using them where
it makes sense) after the series is in.

Not sure if anyone's wanting to further review the rest
of the series, and/or the "graceful unwind termination" patch.
I guess if I don't hear back, I'll apply the whole shebang tomorrow.

-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]