This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: quick status on gdb-7.2.1 & gdb-7.3? (Mar 07)

From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
To: Joel Brobecker <brobecker at adacore dot com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2011 10:42:48 +0100
Subject: Re: quick status on gdb-7.2.1 & gdb-7.3? (Mar 07)
References: <20110307122732.GC2478@adacore.com> <m3pqq2k2z6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20110308051315.GM30306@adacore.com>

On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 06:13:15 +0100, Joel Brobecker wrote:
> > I think ifunc is more important.  Without ifunc, a very common idiom
> > will not work on recent glibc-based systems:
> > 
> >     cond 5 !strcmp(arg, "whatever")
> 
> OK - I have moved this task to the non-optional part of the TODO
> list for GDB 7.3.  Do we have a rough estimate on how soon we might
> be able to merge this code?

It works without bugs but various cases are suboptimal there but I do not
remember which ones.  Working on it today as I was just procrastinating the
linespec review anyway.

Jan

References:
- quick status on gdb-7.2.1 & gdb-7.3? (Mar 07)
  - From: Joel Brobecker
- Re: quick status on gdb-7.2.1 & gdb-7.3? (Mar 07)
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: quick status on gdb-7.2.1 & gdb-7.3? (Mar 07)
  - From: Joel Brobecker

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]