This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I will experiment with "set breakpoint always-inserted" and see, if this is exactly what we need.
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 03:05:49PM -0800, Maxim Grigoriev wrote:
Hello GDB community,Consider "set breakpoint always-inserted".
Has anyone tried to optimize the GDB protocol by letting the remote agent plant and unplant breakpoints when the target resumes and stops, rather than having GDB do it over the wire with round-trip latency on every single breakpoint plant& unplant request?
Certain GDB operations involve a lot of single-stepping,
which can be really slow on certain targets (especially
embedded targets) because of that latency.
I've been wondering lately if we should flip the default.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |