This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch] more comment cleanups

From: Michael Snyder <msnyder at vmware dot com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at gnu dot org>
Cc: "hjl dot tools at gmail dot com" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, "mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl" <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>, "gdb-patches at sourceware dot org" <gdb-patches at sourceware dot org>
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 10:25:52 -0800
Subject: Re: [patch] more comment cleanups
References: <4D1E60A0.1020601@vmware.com> <201012312312.oBVNC4fc013647@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <AANLkTimc4kNHOfO2B95cyKjN9SN1O_+LQ3O_4FpwZ3rR@mail.gmail.com> <4D1E732E.4090002@vmware.com> <834o9tq96f.fsf@gnu.org>

Eli Zaretskii wrote:

Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 16:19:58 -0800
From: Michael Snyder <msnyder@vmware.com>
CC: Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,  "gdb-patches@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>

I'm being guided by where eMacs breaks up lines when I format a comment,
which is something like 72 columns.

Actually, it's 70 columns by default.

Thanks.

So what do others think about source lines over 70 columns?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] more comment cleanups
  - From: Joel Brobecker

References:
- Re: [patch] more comment cleanups
  - From: Michael Snyder
- Re: [patch] more comment cleanups
  - From: Eli Zaretskii

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]