This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: segfault: what should happen when I remove an inferior that is running?
> Just a small nit that the ARI script discovered, we forgot the i18n
> marker:
>
> error (_("cannot remore an active inferior"));
>
> (I also think that the proper spelling is `cannot' rather than
> 'can not' - confirmed by wikipedia, even though they say that it is
> occasionally spelled as two words)
>
> Would you mind making the obvious fix?
Looks like Mark is away from the office, so I checked in the attached
fix (HEAD & 7.2 branch)
--
Joel
commit f114e5b6d29ff343021bb67765d209fa98d675fb
Author: Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
Date: Thu Dec 23 08:27:37 2010 +0400
Add missing _() marker in error message.
gdb/ChangeLog:
* mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_remove_inferior): Use _() marker for error
message. Change spelling of "can not" into "cannot".
diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 24db449..4504f11 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2010-12-23 Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>
+
+ * mi/mi-main.c (mi_cmd_remove_inferior): Use _() marker for error
+ message. Change spelling of "can not" into "cannot".
+
2010-12-23 Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
* arm-tdep.c (arm_gdbarch_init): Remove invoke to
diff --git a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
index 6f66e89..f713412 100644
--- a/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
+++ b/gdb/mi/mi-main.c
@@ -1773,7 +1773,7 @@ mi_cmd_remove_inferior (char *command, char **argv, int argc)
error ("the specified thread group does not exist");
if (inf->pid != 0)
- error ("can not remove an active inferior");
+ error (_("cannot remove an active inferior"));
if (inf == current_inferior ())
{