This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [patch, arm] Consistent display of registers in corefile

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Mark Kettenis <mark dot kettenis at xs4all dot nl>
Cc: yao at codesourcery dot com, gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:57:26 -0500
Subject: Re: [patch, arm] Consistent display of registers in corefile
References: <4D022D1A.7030701@codesourcery.com> <201012101443.oBAEhFiT023638@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl>

On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 03:43:15PM +0100, Mark Kettenis wrote:
> I would suspect that the proper thing to do would be to align the
> tdesc with the code instead of the other way around.  The arm-core.xml
> file seems to underspecify things by omitting the type=xxx clause on
> many registers.  Whoever wrote arm_register_type() at least had to
> make a conscious decision about the signedness of the type used for
> the general purpose registers.

Yeah, I agree.  It was probably my mistake.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch, arm] Consistent display of registers in corefile
  - From: Yao Qi

References:
- [patch, arm] Consistent display of registers in corefile
  - From: Yao Qi
- Re: [patch, arm] Consistent display of registers in corefile
  - From: Mark Kettenis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]