This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] testsuite: break-entry.exp: convert entry point for ppc64


From: Edjunior Barbosa Machado <emachado@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Hi,

This patch intents to collect the correct entry point address for ppc64,
since the address from `info files' points to the function descriptor.
It also changes the last test, in order to permit the `.' prefix, found
on ppc64's symbols.

Is that ok?

Thanks,
--
Edjunior Machado

gdb/testsuite/
2010-10-01  Edjunior Machado  <emachado@br.ibm.com>
	    Luis Machado  <luisgpm@br.ibm.com>

	* testsuite/gdb.base/break-entry.exp: convert entry point for
	ppc64 and expect leading `.' on ppc64's symbols
---
 gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-entry.exp |   12 +++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-entry.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-entry.exp
index d4b86a3..7e4b36f 100644
--- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-entry.exp
+++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/break-entry.exp
@@ -34,10 +34,20 @@ if {$entry == ""} {
     return
 }
 
+if {[istarget powerpc64-*] && [is_lp64_target]} {
+    set test "convert entry point"
+    gdb_test_multiple "p *(void(*)(void) *) $entry" $test {
+	-re " =( \\(\[^0-9\]*\\))? (0x\[0-9a-f\]+)( <.*\[^\r\n\]*)?\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
+	    set entry $expect_out(2,string)
+	    pass $test
+	}
+    }
+}
+
 if ![runto "*$entry"] {
     return
 }
 gdb_test {p/x $pc} " = $entry"
 
 gdb_breakpoint "main"
-gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "main" "main.*"
+gdb_continue_to_breakpoint "main" "\.?main.*"
-- 
1.7.1


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]