This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [PATCH] [Windows] fix format string for 64 bit var in gdbserver
On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Friday, July 16, 2010 16:10:23 Ozkan Sezer wrote:
>>> For windows targets, (x86_64-w64-mingw32, i686-w64-mingw32)
>>> gcc complains:
>>>
>>> ../../../gdb-cvs/gdb/gdbserver/server.c: In function 'handle_query':
>>> ../../../gdb-cvs/gdb/gdbserver/server.c:1542: warning: unknown
>>> conversion type character 'l' in format
>>> ../../../gdb-cvs/gdb/gdbserver/server.c:1542: warning: too many
>>> arguments for format
>>> ../../../gdb-cvs/gdb/gdbserver/server.c:1566: warning: unknown
>>> conversion type character 'l' in format
>>> ../../../gdb-cvs/gdb/gdbserver/server.c:1566: warning: too many
>>> arguments for format
>>>
>>> This is due to the fact that MS printf doesn't support %lld, it uses
>>> its own %I64d which gcc already knows about. The attached patch
>>> changes that. OK for apply?
>>
>> ugh, no. ?why not use a sane define like PRIx64 from inttypes.h ?
>> -mike
>>
>
> I would happily do that, however that would require inttypes
> module merge from gnulib to gdb/gnulib, am I wrong?
>
To be clear, I modified a patch I submitted before to not use
the inttypes PRI macros:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-07/msg00244.html
By analogy, I might use paddress() instead, but for that case
please see the issue I reported at
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-07/msg00254.html
Comments?
--
Ozkan