This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFA] Fix PR gdb/11702, printing of static const member variables

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Doug Evans <dje at google dot com>
Cc: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org, jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:06:11 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix PR gdb/11702, printing of static const member variables
References: <20100627182442.AF5CA84613@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> <AANLkTinHigl1PNltdS8sgwlqYzYB9ba7WJk9dDPda1Rs@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTimst4tpx1NZqAJ4Kox-R5PfjCuzqPK8aGulvxPF@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans <dje@google.com> writes:

Doug> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Doug Evans <dje@google.com> wrote:
>> Maybe another symbol table cleanup is to not put enum values in
>> VARIABLES_DOMAIN.

Doug> Or rather, not rely on LOC_CONST to identify enums?
Doug> [VARIABLES_DOMAIN is just to identify a search request]

I see that it is documented, but I still wonder why search_symbols
excludes enum constants.

Tom

References:
- [RFA] Fix PR gdb/11702, printing of static const member variables
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFA] Fix PR gdb/11702, printing of static const member variables
  - From: Doug Evans
- Re: [RFA] Fix PR gdb/11702, printing of static const member variables
  - From: Doug Evans

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]