This is the mail archive of the gdb-patches@sourceware.org mailing list for the GDB project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [patch] new testcase: Internal error on unqualified name re-set (PR 11657)


On Wednesday 02 June 2010 17:12:18, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 17:03:50 +0200, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On Wednesday 02 June 2010 15:32:33, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> > 
> > > +# Create and source the file that provides information about the compiler
> > > +# used to compile the test case.
> > > +if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
> > > +    return -1
> > > +}
> > 
> > Is this bit actually needed in this test?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> lib/gdb.exp:
> 	# Build a shared library from SOURCES.  You must use get_compiler_info
> 	# first.
> 	proc gdb_compile_shlib {sources dest options} {
> 

Ah.  Always learning.

> 
> > > +clean_restart $executable
> > > +gdb_load_shlibs ${sofile}
> > > +
> > > +gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint pending yes"
> > > +gdb_test "break C::C" {Breakpoint [0-9]+ \(C::C\) pending\.} "break C::C"
> > > +gdb_test_no_output {set variable $brk = $bpnum}
> > > +
> > > +gdb_breakpoint "main"
> > > +gdb_run_cmd
> > > +gdb_test "" "" "start"
> > 
> > Doesn't runto_main work in this case?
> 
> No.  Added:
> 	# runto or runto_main would call delete_breakpoints.

Thanks.

> 
> 
> > So will the test hit an internal error, causing a new FAIL?
> > How about setting up a kfail with the PR number?
> 
> Forgot, KFAILed now:
> 	Running ./gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp ...
> 	PASS: gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp: set breakpoint pending yes
> 	PASS: gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp: break C::C
> 	PASS: gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp: set variable $brk = $bpnum
> 	KFAIL: gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp: start (GDB internal error) (PRMS: breakpoints/11657)
> 	KFAIL: gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp: breakpoint resolved (PRMS: breakpoints/11657)
> 
> OK to check-in?

Great, thanks.  This is fine with me.

> 
> 
> Thanks,
> Jan
> 
> 
> gdb/testsuite/
> 2010-06-02  Jan Kratochvil  <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
> 
> 	* gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp, gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.cc: New.
> 
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.cc
> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
> +/* This testcase is part of GDB, the GNU debugger.
> +
> +   Copyright 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> +   This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> +   (at your option) any later version.
> +
> +   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +   GNU General Public License for more details.
> +
> +   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
> +
> +class C
> +  {
> +  public:
> +    C() {}
> +    C(int x) {}
> +  };
> +
> +C a;
> +C b(1);
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cp/re-set-overloaded.exp
> @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
> +# Copyright 2010 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> +
> +# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> +# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> +# the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
> +# (at your option) any later version.
> +#
> +# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> +# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> +# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
> +# GNU General Public License for more details.
> +#
> +# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> +# along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> +
> +if { [skip_cplus_tests] } { continue }
> +if { [skip_shlib_tests] } { continue }
> +
> +set testfile re-set-overloaded
> +set srcfile bool.cc
> +set executable $testfile
> +set binfile $objdir/$subdir/$executable
> +
> +set libsrcfile ${testfile}.cc
> +set sofile $objdir/$subdir/${testfile}.so
> +
> +# Create and source the file that provides information about the compiler
> +# used to compile the test case.
> +if [get_compiler_info ${binfile} "c++"] {
> +    return -1
> +}
> +
> +if { [gdb_compile_shlib $srcdir/$subdir/$libsrcfile $sofile {debug c++}] != ""
> +     || [gdb_compile $srcdir/$subdir/$srcfile $binfile executable [list debug "c++" shlib=${sofile}]] != ""} {
> +    untested ${testfile}.exp
> +    return -1
> +}
> +
> +clean_restart $executable
> +gdb_load_shlibs ${sofile}
> +
> +gdb_test_no_output "set breakpoint pending yes"
> +gdb_test "break C::C" {Breakpoint [0-9]+ \(C::C\) pending\.} "break C::C"
> +gdb_test_no_output {set variable $brk = $bpnum}
> +
> +# runto or runto_main would call delete_breakpoints.
> +gdb_breakpoint "main"
> +gdb_run_cmd
> +setup_kfail breakpoints/11657 *-*-* 
> +gdb_test "" "" "start"
> +
> +set test "breakpoint resolved"
> +gdb_test_multiple {info breakpoints $brk} $test {
> +    -re "<PENDING>" {
> +	kfail breakpoints/11657 $test
> +    }
> +    -re "\r\n$gdb_prompt $" {
> +	# FIXME: Check more specific resolution state.
> +	pass $test
> +    }
> +}
> 


-- 
Pedro Alves


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]