Re: PING: [PATCH] properly check error return from socket() and accept() calls

[Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz at gmail dot com>]

On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:45 PM, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ozkan" == Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Ozkan> PING.
>
> Ozkan> 2010-04-03 ?Ozkan Sezer ?<sezeroz@gmail.com>
> Ozkan> gdb/
> Ozkan> ?* ser-tcp.c (net_open): Check error return from socket() call by its
> Ozkan> ?equality to -1 not by it being negative.
> Ozkan> ?(net_close): Likewise.
> [...]
>
> It seems reasonable enough to me.
>
> Do you have a copyright assignment in place? ?TBH it isn't clear to me
> whether this patch requires one -- it is long enough, but I would say
> that there is really only one way to write this patch.
>
> Tom
>

I started the copyright assignment, 564768 is the number
they gave to me, but it has been almost a month and they
aren't responding to my emails, either.  So I don't know
what is going on with the paper work.

I am attaching an up-to-date version of the patch which
applies cleanly to the current cvs.

Regards.

--
Ozkan

Attachment: gdb_socket_err_checks.patch
Description: Binary data