This is the mail archive of the
gdb-patches@sourceware.org
mailing list for the GDB project.
Re: [patch] Fix CLONE_VM vs. TLS [Re: Is CLONE_VM really needed in gdbserver?]
- From: Jan Kratochvil <jan dot kratochvil at redhat dot com>
- To: gdb-patches at sourceware dot org
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, GDB <gdb at sourceware dot org>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:20:10 +0100
- Subject: Re: [patch] Fix CLONE_VM vs. TLS [Re: Is CLONE_VM really needed in gdbserver?]
- References: <6dc9ffc81001261551j6221db6v88e96713d6dd9497@mail.gmail.com> <20100127000821.GA29862@caradoc.them.org> <20100127221236.GA4746@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100128170103.GA9936@caradoc.them.org> <20100129012625.GA8631@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> <20100129023040.GA20267@caradoc.them.org> <20100129124128.GA6588@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:41:28 +0100, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> Going to check it in in some times as this change is IMO pre-approved.
[...]
> gdb/gdbserver/
> 2010-01-29 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> PR libc/11214:
> * linux-low.c (linux_tracefork_child) [!(__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU)]: New.
> (linux_test_for_tracefork): Move `stack' into [__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU].
> (linux_test_for_tracefork) [!(__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU)]: New.
>
> gdb/testsuite/
> 2010-01-29 Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
>
> PR libc/11214:
> * gdb.threads/current-lwp-dead.c: Include features.h.
> (HAS_NOMMU): New.
> (fn, main): Move CLONE_VM into [__UCLIBC__ && HAS_NOMMU].
Checked-in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2010-02/msg00010.html
Regards,
Jan